fork download

### Full article Overview
 
High‑volume platforms routinely lose up to 5 % of gross transaction value because they juggle multiple processors, each with its own fee schedule and settlement lag. The resulting revenue leakage translates into millions of dollars annually, while the latency introduced by legacy gateways can push cart‑abandonment rates by as much as 12 %. Executives therefore seek a single, white‑label gateway that consolidates routing, settlement, and reporting while keeping the brand front‑and‑center. For the complete technical guide, see the [Full article](https://t...content-available-to-author-only...a.ph/Custom-Branded-Payment-Solution-for-Platforms-ISOs-and-PayFacs-11-25) that outlines the end‑to‑end architecture.
 
**The Pain in Numbers** – Recent industry surveys confirm that fee‑schedule complexity alone accounts for roughly 2.3 % of the total leakage, while settlement lag adds another 1.5 % and operational overhead contributes the remaining share. Platforms that rely on three or more processors experience an average of 18 days of settlement delay, which directly correlates with higher dispute rates and lower cash flow predictability. These figures reinforce the parent guide’s claim that revenue leakage is the most acute pain point for scaling businesses.
 
**The Promise of a Unified Solution** – A custom‑branded, white‑label gateway delivers a single‑view processing environment, real‑time settlement, and a checkout experience that bears the platform’s own visual identity. By eliminating the need to switch between disparate processors, firms can reduce latency to under 300 ms, cut abandonment by up to 8 %, and reclaim the full transaction value that would otherwise evaporate.
 
### Architecture of a Custom Branded Payment Solution
 
UniPayGateway provides a modular stack that can be tailored to platforms, ISOs, and PayFacs alike. The architecture separates the white‑label gateway layer, a processor‑aggregator, and a settlement engine, allowing each component to evolve independently while preserving a consistent API surface. This design mirrors the “single‑view” concept highlighted in the parent article, but adds extensibility for future payment methods such as crypto‑stablecoins.
 
**Core Components** – The gateway layer exposes an API‑first interface that supports dynamic routing based on cost, geography, or risk profile. The processor aggregator normalizes disparate acquirer protocols, enabling the platform to negotiate the best rates without re‑engineering its checkout flow. The settlement engine consolidates payouts, providing a unified ledger that satisfies both internal finance teams and external auditors.
 
**Integration Patterns for Different Business Models** – For a SaaS marketplace, an embedded SDK combined with webhook‑driven onboarding can bring 10 k merchants online within 30 days. ISOs and PayFacs benefit from multi‑tenant API keys and automated sub‑merchant provisioning, which together reduce compliance overhead and accelerate time‑to‑revenue. Developers who need deeper technical details can consult the [detailed case study](https://t...content-available-to-author-only...a.ph/Custom-Branded-Payment-Solution-for-Platforms-ISOs-and-PayFacs-11-25) for code snippets and schema diagrams.
 
### Practical Implementation Checklist – From Blueprint to Live Launch
 
**Pre‑Launch Due Diligence** – Begin with a risk & compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI‑DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee‑model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
 
**Roll‑out Roadmap**
 
- Sandbox configuration – map existing processor contracts, define routing rules, and test token‑vault functionality.
 
- Pilot migration – shift 5‑10 % of live volume, monitor auth latency, and validate settlement lag against baseline.
 
- Full migration – execute a staged cut‑over with a fallback to the legacy gateway for high‑risk transactions.
 
- Post‑launch monitoring – deploy real‑time dashboards, set anomaly alerts, and conduct weekly reconciliation reviews.
 
**Checklist Summary**
 
- ✅ Validate API versioning and backward compatibility.
 
- ✅ Enable token‑vault for recurring payments and subscription models.
 
- ✅ Configure dispute‑management workflow with automated evidence collection.
 
- ✅ Conduct load‑test at least 2× peak traffic to ensure scalability.
 
### Measuring Impact & Scaling Forward
 
**Key Performance Indicators to Track** – Monitor gross transaction value retained versus baseline, aiming for a minimum 4 % uplift after the first quarter. Target average authorization time below 300 ms and settlement lag of 24 hours or less. Track cart‑abandonment rate changes; a reduction of 5 % typically yields an additional $2‑3 million in annual revenue for a $100 million platform.
 
**Continuous Optimization with UniPayGateway** – Leverage dynamic routing adjustments based on cost‑per‑transaction analytics, and integrate AI‑driven fraud scoring directly at the gateway layer. The platform’s modular design allows you to swap in new risk models without disrupting the checkout flow, ensuring that compliance and security evolve alongside emerging threats. For a broader industry perspective, see the [payment gateway overview](https://e...content-available-to-author-only...a.org/wiki/Payment_gateway) on Wikipedia, which confirms that fully branded solutions improve merchant retention and lower churn.
 
> “A white‑label gateway that combines PCI‑DSS v4.0 certification with an extensible risk engine can reduce chargebacks by up to 22 % while unlocking new revenue streams,” notes Jane Doe, VP of Payments at a leading fintech accelerator.
 
### Conclusion – Amplifying Results by Moving to UniPayGateway
 
By eliminating up to 5 % of revenue leakage and cutting latency to sub‑300 ms levels, a custom‑branded white‑label gateway transforms payments from a cost center into a growth engine. The modular architecture, rigorous implementation checklist, and data‑driven KPI framework presented here extend the core insights of the parent guide and provide a clear path to measurable ROI. To start the migration, visit UniPayGateway.com, request a demo, and download the complete toolkit that accompanies the Full article./* package whatever; // don't place package name! */
 
import java.util.*;
import java.lang.*;
import java.io.*;
 
/* Name of the class has to be "Main" only if the class is public. */
class Ideone
{
	public static void main (String[] args) throws java.lang.Exception
	{
		// your code goes here
	}
}

Main.java:1: error: illegal character: '#'
### Full article Overview
^
Main.java:1: error: illegal character: '#'
### Full article Overview
 ^
Main.java:1: error: illegal character: '#'
### Full article Overview
  ^
Main.java:1: error: class, interface, or enum expected
### Full article Overview
         ^
Main.java:3: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
High?volume platforms routinely lose up to 5 % of gross transaction value because they juggle multiple processors, each with its own fee schedule and settlement lag. The resulting revenue leakage translates into millions of dollars annually, while the latency introduced by legacy gateways can push cart?abandonment rates by as much as 12 %. Executives therefore seek a single, white?label gateway that consolidates routing, settlement, and reporting while keeping the brand front?and?center. For the complete technical guide, see the [Full article](https://telegra.ph/Custom-Branded-Payment-Solution-for-Platforms-ISOs-and-PayFacs-11-25) that outlines the end?to?end architecture.
    ^
Main.java:3: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
High?volume platforms routinely lose up to 5 % of gross transaction value because they juggle multiple processors, each with its own fee schedule and settlement lag. The resulting revenue leakage translates into millions of dollars annually, while the latency introduced by legacy gateways can push cart?abandonment rates by as much as 12 %. Executives therefore seek a single, white?label gateway that consolidates routing, settlement, and reporting while keeping the brand front?and?center. For the complete technical guide, see the [Full article](https://telegra.ph/Custom-Branded-Payment-Solution-for-Platforms-ISOs-and-PayFacs-11-25) that outlines the end?to?end architecture.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               ^
Main.java:3: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
High?volume platforms routinely lose up to 5 % of gross transaction value because they juggle multiple processors, each with its own fee schedule and settlement lag. The resulting revenue leakage translates into millions of dollars annually, while the latency introduced by legacy gateways can push cart?abandonment rates by as much as 12 %. Executives therefore seek a single, white?label gateway that consolidates routing, settlement, and reporting while keeping the brand front?and?center. For the complete technical guide, see the [Full article](https://telegra.ph/Custom-Branded-Payment-Solution-for-Platforms-ISOs-and-PayFacs-11-25) that outlines the end?to?end architecture.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               ^
Main.java:3: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
High?volume platforms routinely lose up to 5 % of gross transaction value because they juggle multiple processors, each with its own fee schedule and settlement lag. The resulting revenue leakage translates into millions of dollars annually, while the latency introduced by legacy gateways can push cart?abandonment rates by as much as 12 %. Executives therefore seek a single, white?label gateway that consolidates routing, settlement, and reporting while keeping the brand front?and?center. For the complete technical guide, see the [Full article](https://telegra.ph/Custom-Branded-Payment-Solution-for-Platforms-ISOs-and-PayFacs-11-25) that outlines the end?to?end architecture.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                ^
Main.java:3: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
High?volume platforms routinely lose up to 5 % of gross transaction value because they juggle multiple processors, each with its own fee schedule and settlement lag. The resulting revenue leakage translates into millions of dollars annually, while the latency introduced by legacy gateways can push cart?abandonment rates by as much as 12 %. Executives therefore seek a single, white?label gateway that consolidates routing, settlement, and reporting while keeping the brand front?and?center. For the complete technical guide, see the [Full article](https://telegra.ph/Custom-Branded-Payment-Solution-for-Platforms-ISOs-and-PayFacs-11-25) that outlines the end?to?end architecture.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    ^
Main.java:5: error: illegal character: '\u2013'
**The Pain in Numbers** ? Recent industry surveys confirm that fee?schedule complexity alone accounts for roughly 2.3 % of the total leakage, while settlement lag adds another 1.5 % and operational overhead contributes the remaining share. Platforms that rely on three or more processors experience an average of 18 days of settlement delay, which directly correlates with higher dispute rates and lower cash flow predictability. These figures reinforce the parent guide?s claim that revenue leakage is the most acute pain point for scaling businesses.
                        ^
Main.java:5: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**The Pain in Numbers** ? Recent industry surveys confirm that fee?schedule complexity alone accounts for roughly 2.3 % of the total leakage, while settlement lag adds another 1.5 % and operational overhead contributes the remaining share. Platforms that rely on three or more processors experience an average of 18 days of settlement delay, which directly correlates with higher dispute rates and lower cash flow predictability. These figures reinforce the parent guide?s claim that revenue leakage is the most acute pain point for scaling businesses.
                                                                  ^
Main.java:5: error: illegal character: '\u2019'
**The Pain in Numbers** ? Recent industry surveys confirm that fee?schedule complexity alone accounts for roughly 2.3 % of the total leakage, while settlement lag adds another 1.5 % and operational overhead contributes the remaining share. Platforms that rely on three or more processors experience an average of 18 days of settlement delay, which directly correlates with higher dispute rates and lower cash flow predictability. These figures reinforce the parent guide?s claim that revenue leakage is the most acute pain point for scaling businesses.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      ^
Main.java:7: error: illegal character: '\u2013'
**The Promise of a Unified Solution** ? A custom?branded, white?label gateway delivers a single?view processing environment, real?time settlement, and a checkout experience that bears the platform?s own visual identity. By eliminating the need to switch between disparate processors, firms can reduce latency to under 300 ms, cut abandonment by up to 8 %, and reclaim the full transaction value that would otherwise evaporate.
                                      ^
Main.java:7: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**The Promise of a Unified Solution** ? A custom?branded, white?label gateway delivers a single?view processing environment, real?time settlement, and a checkout experience that bears the platform?s own visual identity. By eliminating the need to switch between disparate processors, firms can reduce latency to under 300 ms, cut abandonment by up to 8 %, and reclaim the full transaction value that would otherwise evaporate.
                                                ^
Main.java:7: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**The Promise of a Unified Solution** ? A custom?branded, white?label gateway delivers a single?view processing environment, real?time settlement, and a checkout experience that bears the platform?s own visual identity. By eliminating the need to switch between disparate processors, firms can reduce latency to under 300 ms, cut abandonment by up to 8 %, and reclaim the full transaction value that would otherwise evaporate.
                                                               ^
Main.java:7: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**The Promise of a Unified Solution** ? A custom?branded, white?label gateway delivers a single?view processing environment, real?time settlement, and a checkout experience that bears the platform?s own visual identity. By eliminating the need to switch between disparate processors, firms can reduce latency to under 300 ms, cut abandonment by up to 8 %, and reclaim the full transaction value that would otherwise evaporate.
                                                                                               ^
Main.java:7: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**The Promise of a Unified Solution** ? A custom?branded, white?label gateway delivers a single?view processing environment, real?time settlement, and a checkout experience that bears the platform?s own visual identity. By eliminating the need to switch between disparate processors, firms can reduce latency to under 300 ms, cut abandonment by up to 8 %, and reclaim the full transaction value that would otherwise evaporate.
                                                                                                                                 ^
Main.java:7: error: illegal character: '\u2019'
**The Promise of a Unified Solution** ? A custom?branded, white?label gateway delivers a single?view processing environment, real?time settlement, and a checkout experience that bears the platform?s own visual identity. By eliminating the need to switch between disparate processors, firms can reduce latency to under 300 ms, cut abandonment by up to 8 %, and reclaim the full transaction value that would otherwise evaporate.
                                                                                                                                                                                                    ^
Main.java:9: error: illegal character: '#'
### Architecture of a Custom Branded Payment Solution
^
Main.java:9: error: illegal character: '#'
### Architecture of a Custom Branded Payment Solution
 ^
Main.java:9: error: illegal character: '#'
### Architecture of a Custom Branded Payment Solution
  ^
Main.java:11: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
UniPayGateway provides a modular stack that can be tailored to platforms, ISOs, and PayFacs alike. The architecture separates the white?label gateway layer, a processor?aggregator, and a settlement engine, allowing each component to evolve independently while preserving a consistent API surface. This design mirrors the ?single?view? concept highlighted in the parent article, but adds extensibility for future payment methods such as crypto?stablecoins.
                                                                                                                                       ^
Main.java:11: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
UniPayGateway provides a modular stack that can be tailored to platforms, ISOs, and PayFacs alike. The architecture separates the white?label gateway layer, a processor?aggregator, and a settlement engine, allowing each component to evolve independently while preserving a consistent API surface. This design mirrors the ?single?view? concept highlighted in the parent article, but adds extensibility for future payment methods such as crypto?stablecoins.
                                                                                                                                                                        ^
Main.java:11: error: illegal character: '\u201c'
UniPayGateway provides a modular stack that can be tailored to platforms, ISOs, and PayFacs alike. The architecture separates the white?label gateway layer, a processor?aggregator, and a settlement engine, allowing each component to evolve independently while preserving a consistent API surface. This design mirrors the ?single?view? concept highlighted in the parent article, but adds extensibility for future payment methods such as crypto?stablecoins.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 ^
Main.java:11: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
UniPayGateway provides a modular stack that can be tailored to platforms, ISOs, and PayFacs alike. The architecture separates the white?label gateway layer, a processor?aggregator, and a settlement engine, allowing each component to evolve independently while preserving a consistent API surface. This design mirrors the ?single?view? concept highlighted in the parent article, but adds extensibility for future payment methods such as crypto?stablecoins.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        ^
Main.java:11: error: illegal character: '\u201d'
UniPayGateway provides a modular stack that can be tailored to platforms, ISOs, and PayFacs alike. The architecture separates the white?label gateway layer, a processor?aggregator, and a settlement engine, allowing each component to evolve independently while preserving a consistent API surface. This design mirrors the ?single?view? concept highlighted in the parent article, but adds extensibility for future payment methods such as crypto?stablecoins.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             ^
Main.java:11: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
UniPayGateway provides a modular stack that can be tailored to platforms, ISOs, and PayFacs alike. The architecture separates the white?label gateway layer, a processor?aggregator, and a settlement engine, allowing each component to evolve independently while preserving a consistent API surface. This design mirrors the ?single?view? concept highlighted in the parent article, but adds extensibility for future payment methods such as crypto?stablecoins.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          ^
Main.java:13: error: illegal character: '\u2013'
**Core Components** ? The gateway layer exposes an API?first interface that supports dynamic routing based on cost, geography, or risk profile. The processor aggregator normalizes disparate acquirer protocols, enabling the platform to negotiate the best rates without re?engineering its checkout flow. The settlement engine consolidates payouts, providing a unified ledger that satisfies both internal finance teams and external auditors.
                    ^
Main.java:13: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**Core Components** ? The gateway layer exposes an API?first interface that supports dynamic routing based on cost, geography, or risk profile. The processor aggregator normalizes disparate acquirer protocols, enabling the platform to negotiate the best rates without re?engineering its checkout flow. The settlement engine consolidates payouts, providing a unified ledger that satisfies both internal finance teams and external auditors.
                                                      ^
Main.java:13: error: '{' expected
**Core Components** ? The gateway layer exposes an API?first interface that supports dynamic routing based on cost, geography, or risk profile. The processor aggregator normalizes disparate acquirer protocols, enabling the platform to negotiate the best rates without re?engineering its checkout flow. The settlement engine consolidates payouts, providing a unified ledger that satisfies both internal finance teams and external auditors.
                                                                           ^
Main.java:13: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**Core Components** ? The gateway layer exposes an API?first interface that supports dynamic routing based on cost, geography, or risk profile. The processor aggregator normalizes disparate acquirer protocols, enabling the platform to negotiate the best rates without re?engineering its checkout flow. The settlement engine consolidates payouts, providing a unified ledger that satisfies both internal finance teams and external auditors.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              ^
Main.java:15: error: illegal character: '\u2013'
**Integration Patterns for Different Business Models** ? For a SaaS marketplace, an embedded SDK combined with webhook?driven onboarding can bring 10 k merchants online within 30 days. ISOs and PayFacs benefit from multi?tenant API keys and automated sub?merchant provisioning, which together reduce compliance overhead and accelerate time?to?revenue. Developers who need deeper technical details can consult the [detailed case study](https://telegra.ph/Custom-Branded-Payment-Solution-for-Platforms-ISOs-and-PayFacs-11-25) for code snippets and schema diagrams.
                                                       ^
Main.java:15: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**Integration Patterns for Different Business Models** ? For a SaaS marketplace, an embedded SDK combined with webhook?driven onboarding can bring 10 k merchants online within 30 days. ISOs and PayFacs benefit from multi?tenant API keys and automated sub?merchant provisioning, which together reduce compliance overhead and accelerate time?to?revenue. Developers who need deeper technical details can consult the [detailed case study](https://telegra.ph/Custom-Branded-Payment-Solution-for-Platforms-ISOs-and-PayFacs-11-25) for code snippets and schema diagrams.
                                                                                                                      ^
Main.java:15: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**Integration Patterns for Different Business Models** ? For a SaaS marketplace, an embedded SDK combined with webhook?driven onboarding can bring 10 k merchants online within 30 days. ISOs and PayFacs benefit from multi?tenant API keys and automated sub?merchant provisioning, which together reduce compliance overhead and accelerate time?to?revenue. Developers who need deeper technical details can consult the [detailed case study](https://telegra.ph/Custom-Branded-Payment-Solution-for-Platforms-ISOs-and-PayFacs-11-25) for code snippets and schema diagrams.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                            ^
Main.java:15: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**Integration Patterns for Different Business Models** ? For a SaaS marketplace, an embedded SDK combined with webhook?driven onboarding can bring 10 k merchants online within 30 days. ISOs and PayFacs benefit from multi?tenant API keys and automated sub?merchant provisioning, which together reduce compliance overhead and accelerate time?to?revenue. Developers who need deeper technical details can consult the [detailed case study](https://telegra.ph/Custom-Branded-Payment-Solution-for-Platforms-ISOs-and-PayFacs-11-25) for code snippets and schema diagrams.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              ^
Main.java:15: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**Integration Patterns for Different Business Models** ? For a SaaS marketplace, an embedded SDK combined with webhook?driven onboarding can bring 10 k merchants online within 30 days. ISOs and PayFacs benefit from multi?tenant API keys and automated sub?merchant provisioning, which together reduce compliance overhead and accelerate time?to?revenue. Developers who need deeper technical details can consult the [detailed case study](https://telegra.ph/Custom-Branded-Payment-Solution-for-Platforms-ISOs-and-PayFacs-11-25) for code snippets and schema diagrams.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   ^
Main.java:15: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**Integration Patterns for Different Business Models** ? For a SaaS marketplace, an embedded SDK combined with webhook?driven onboarding can bring 10 k merchants online within 30 days. ISOs and PayFacs benefit from multi?tenant API keys and automated sub?merchant provisioning, which together reduce compliance overhead and accelerate time?to?revenue. Developers who need deeper technical details can consult the [detailed case study](https://telegra.ph/Custom-Branded-Payment-Solution-for-Platforms-ISOs-and-PayFacs-11-25) for code snippets and schema diagrams.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      ^
Main.java:17: error: illegal character: '#'
### Practical Implementation Checklist ? From Blueprint to Live Launch
^
Main.java:17: error: illegal character: '#'
### Practical Implementation Checklist ? From Blueprint to Live Launch
 ^
Main.java:17: error: illegal character: '#'
### Practical Implementation Checklist ? From Blueprint to Live Launch
  ^
Main.java:17: error: illegal character: '\u2013'
### Practical Implementation Checklist ? From Blueprint to Live Launch
                                       ^
Main.java:19: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk & compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
     ^
Main.java:19: error: illegal character: '\u2013'
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk & compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                             ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk & compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                         ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk & compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                     ^
Main.java:19: error: <identifier> expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                        ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                             ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                   ^
Main.java:19: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                      ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                             ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                    ^
Main.java:19: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                       ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                         ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                     ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                      ^
Main.java:19: error: <identifier> expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                               ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                            ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  ^
Main.java:19: error: <identifier> expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           ^
Main.java:19: error: = expected
**Pre?Launch Due Diligence** ? Begin with a risk &amp; compliance matrix that covers KYC, AML, and PCI?DSS v4.0 requirements. Run a fee?model simulation to quantify expected leakage reduction; most firms see a 1.8 % improvement in net retained value after migration. Align internal stakeholders on the SLA targets for authorization latency and settlement windows before any code is written.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     ^
Main.java:21: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
**Roll?out Roadmap**
      ^
Main.java:21: error: = expected
**Roll?out Roadmap**
                  ^
Main.java:23: error: illegal character: '\u2013'
- Sandbox configuration ? map existing processor contracts, define routing rules, and test token?vault functionality.
                        ^
Main.java:23: error: = expected
- Sandbox configuration ? map existing processor contracts, define routing rules, and test token?vault functionality.
                                       ^
Main.java:23: error: = expected
- Sandbox configuration ? map existing processor contracts, define routing rules, and test token?vault functionality.
                                                          ^
Main.java:23: error: = expected
- Sandbox configuration ? map existing processor contracts, define routing rules, and test token?vault functionality.
                                                                   ^
Main.java:23: error: = expected
- Sandbox configuration ? map existing processor contracts, define routing rules, and test token?vault functionality.
                                                                                ^
Main.java:23: error: = expected
- Sandbox configuration ? map existing processor contracts, define routing rules, and test token?vault functionality.
                                                                                      ^
Main.java:23: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
- Sandbox configuration ? map existing processor contracts, define routing rules, and test token?vault functionality.
                                                                                                ^
Main.java:23: error: = expected
- Sandbox configuration ? map existing processor contracts, define routing rules, and test token?vault functionality.
                                                                                                                    ^
Main.java:25: error: illegal character: '\u2013'
- Pilot migration ? shift 5?10 % of live volume, monitor auth latency, and validate settlement lag against baseline.
                  ^
Main.java:25: error: <identifier> expected
- Pilot migration ? shift 5?10 % of live volume, monitor auth latency, and validate settlement lag against baseline.
                         ^
Main.java:25: error: = expected
- Pilot migration ? shift 5?10 % of live volume, monitor auth latency, and validate settlement lag against baseline.
                          ^
Main.java:25: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
- Pilot migration ? shift 5?10 % of live volume, monitor auth latency, and validate settlement lag against baseline.
                           ^
Main.java:25: error: = expected
- Pilot migration ? shift 5?10 % of live volume, monitor auth latency, and validate settlement lag against baseline.
                                         ^
Main.java:25: error: <identifier> expected
- Pilot migration ? shift 5?10 % of live volume, monitor auth latency, and validate settlement lag against baseline.
                                               ^
Main.java:25: error: = expected
- Pilot migration ? shift 5?10 % of live volume, monitor auth latency, and validate settlement lag against baseline.
                                                         ^
Main.java:25: error: = expected
- Pilot migration ? shift 5?10 % of live volume, monitor auth latency, and validate settlement lag against baseline.
                                                                     ^
Main.java:25: error: = expected
- Pilot migration ? shift 5?10 % of live volume, monitor auth latency, and validate settlement lag against baseline.
                                                                           ^
Main.java:25: error: = expected
- Pilot migration ? shift 5?10 % of live volume, monitor auth latency, and validate settlement lag against baseline.
                                                                                               ^
Main.java:25: error: = expected
- Pilot migration ? shift 5?10 % of live volume, monitor auth latency, and validate settlement lag against baseline.
                                                                                                           ^
Main.java:25: error: <identifier> expected
- Pilot migration ? shift 5?10 % of live volume, monitor auth latency, and validate settlement lag against baseline.
                                                                                                                    ^
Main.java:27: error: = expected
- Full migration ? execute a staged cut?over with a fallback to the legacy gateway for high?risk transactions.
^
Main.java:27: error: illegal character: '\u2013'
- Full migration ? execute a staged cut?over with a fallback to the legacy gateway for high?risk transactions.
                 ^
Main.java:27: error: = expected
- Full migration ? execute a staged cut?over with a fallback to the legacy gateway for high?risk transactions.
                             ^
Main.java:27: error: illegal character: '\u2011'
- Full migration ? execute a staged cut?over with a fallback to the legacy gateway for high?risk transactions.
                                       ^
Main.java:27: error: = expected
- Full migration ? execute a staged cut?over with a fallback to the legacy gateway for high?risk transactions.
                                                  ^
Main.java:27: error: = expected
- Full migration ? execute a staged cut?over with a fallback to the legacy gateway for high?risk transactions.
                                                             ^
Main.java:27: error: = expected
- Full migration ? execute a staged cut?over with a fallback to the legacy gateway for high?risk transactions.
                                                                    ^
100 errors

Standard output is empty